Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Test test_start_ci_with_a_get_request is flaky #825

Open
6 of 9 tasks
Tarun-Arora opened this issue Jul 9, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
6 of 9 tasks

[BUG] Test test_start_ci_with_a_get_request is flaky #825

Tarun-Arora opened this issue Jul 9, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Tarun-Arora
Copy link
Contributor

Please prefix your issue with one of the following: [BUG], [PROPOSAL], [QUESTION].

Sample platform commit (found at the bottom of each page) : X.X.X

In raising this issue, I confirm the following (please check boxes, eg [X]):

  • I have read and understood the contributors guide.
  • I have checked that the bug-fix I am reporting can be replicated, or that the feature I am suggesting isn't already present.
  • I have checked that the issue I'm posting isn't already reported.
  • I have checked that the issue I'm posting isn't already solved and no duplicates exist in closed issues and in opened issues
  • I have checked the pull requests tab for existing solutions/implementations to my issue/suggestion.

My familiarity with the project is as follows (check one, eg [X]):

  • I have never visited/used the platform.
  • I have used the platform just a couple of times.
  • I have used the platform extensively, but have not contributed previously.
  • I am an active contributor to the platform.

This test sometimes fail randomly
Example: https://github.com/CCExtractor/sample-platform/actions/runs/5501969470/jobs/10025917892

@canihavesomecoffee
Copy link
Member

Yes, I suspect it's something with Flask, not sure if it's something we can fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants