You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Single project MSIX packaging has been supported for all apps referencing Windows App SDK for quite some time regardless of which UI framework they used. However, that approach had the drawback of additional dependencies which increased MSIX package sizes.
With Microsoft.Windows.SDK.BuildTools.MSIX new packaging tools are available that are decoupled from Windows App SDK and support arbitrary project types. This support is not official yet and there are still some bugs: microsoft/WindowsAppSDK#4932
Despite the limitations I consider the new package a viable alternative to Windows Application Packaging Project or custom scripts calling MakeAppx.exe manually. It should be included in these docs with instructions how to set it up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Set up your desktop application for MSIX packaging in Visual Studio states that single project MSIX packaging is only supported for WinUI 3 projects (which is factually wrong) and all other projects should use a Windows Application Packaging Project.
Single project MSIX packaging has been supported for all apps referencing Windows App SDK for quite some time regardless of which UI framework they used. However, that approach had the drawback of additional dependencies which increased MSIX package sizes.
With
Microsoft.Windows.SDK.BuildTools.MSIX
new packaging tools are available that are decoupled from Windows App SDK and support arbitrary project types. This support is not official yet and there are still some bugs: microsoft/WindowsAppSDK#4932Despite the limitations I consider the new package a viable alternative to Windows Application Packaging Project or custom scripts calling
MakeAppx.exe
manually. It should be included in these docs with instructions how to set it up.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: