Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TF2 and incongruence with TF Dev summit message? #519

Open
taiya opened this issue Feb 10, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

TF2 and incongruence with TF Dev summit message? #519

taiya opened this issue Feb 10, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@taiya
Copy link

taiya commented Feb 10, 2020

I was watching your dev summit talk and you mentioned that the design was mostly eager, but in the examples on this repo it seems you make use of TF1 functional/graph mode extensively?

Also, the last commit was almost a year ago.
Is this direction a dead end and is there something more relevant we should look at?

Overall, if not in active development, it might not be a bad idea to declare the project as such in the main readme.md?

@oxinabox
Copy link
Collaborator

I was watching your dev summit talk and you mentioned that the design was mostly eager, but in the examples on this repo it seems you make use of TF1 functional/graph mode extensively?

None of the examples have been updated to use eager mode.
Eager mode works.


is there something more relevant we should look at?

Flux is really great, I'm writing mostly Flux code these days.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants