-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Get a better name #2
Comments
fuzzmylib Exactly one result in google (before this comment was posted): https://www.google.com/search?q=fuzzmylib Makes for nice (hypothetical, future) cargo command: |
If it was a cargo command, that would make sense. But for the name of a project, I rather like ... but if you'd rather not have such a silly pun for the name of it, I understand. |
Google autocorrects "silkwyrm" to "silkworm", and even that produces a lot of results, so I'm afraid that's a no-go from the discoverability standpoint. Another unique result on google: "fuzzfestation", short of "fuzz" and "infestation". Might have a negative connotation to it though? |
Usually "infestation" is negative, but software has all sorts of terms where connotations are ignored, so I am not sure if it's that big a deal. That did make me think of the more positive "fuzzfest", but that seems to be a concert. |
This project could use a catchier name.
The goal is to make it possible to fuzz libraries with large API surfaces. This is currently impractical because fuzzing harnesses have to be written manually. This project aims to automate that.
The name should reflect that. Please put your name suggestions in the comments, one comment per name.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: