Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implement local and function calls for v128 in the fast interpreter #4005
base: dev/simd_for_interp
Are you sure you want to change the base?
implement local and function calls for v128 in the fast interpreter #4005
Changes from all commits
3562824
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#if WASM_ENABLE_SIMDE != 0
this should be#if WASM_ENABLE_SIMD != 0
but I'll fix it once we make the spec tests work and are ready to launchThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I do think we might not need WASM_ENABLE_SIMDE flag in the first place, it probably should be set based on fast-interp + simd
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file already quite bloated and difficult to maintain, I wonder if you considered refactoring it a bit? E.g. both
EXT_OP_TEE_LOCAL_FAST_V128
andEXT_OP_COPY_STACK_TOP_V128
are very similar for the i64 opcode implementations.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems that EXT_OP_COPY_STACK_TOP_V128 is unneeded? It isn't emitted in wasm_loader.c.