Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[http-client-csharp] the post processor should always keep customized code as root documents #5481
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[http-client-csharp] the post processor should always keep customized code as root documents #5481
Changes from 4 commits
668c68b
9056033
e627a04
1acd116
a7a2c4b
eb12d7b
7214052
5f9fefe
6ca1c95
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is a duplicate with
GetCompilationAsync
method in this same class.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: return it instead of declaring a variable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to do that but the return of this method is
Task<Compilation?>
and here we want aTask<Compilation>
, we must have a local variable and assert it is not null.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
otherwise it might look like this:
I prefer local variable rather than the above
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So it will be null if SupportsCompilation is false. It's not clear to me when that would happen but perhaps we should add some assertion that it is not null rather than using the null-forgiving operator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I see this is specifically for the test helper, so probably less of an issue here. But for the GetCompilationAsync method we should add validation with a helpful error message that says SupportsCompilation must be true.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you mean that we should add an assertion here on compilation cannot be null?
This method
GetCompilationAsync
is not our method, this method comes from roslyn API.In our version of
GetCompilationAsync
, we haveDebug.Assert(compilation is not null)
and the method does not return a nullable result.